Emma

I actually kind of like the novel Emma. When I’m reading, I don’t very much, but looking back on the different chapters that I have read, I find that it actually is quite entertaining. I’m not sure if Jane Austen wanted it to be this sort of humor, but I took it that way. The different characters and the schemes that they work themselves into is what makes the novel so funny. I also like it though because I like this time period. I like learning about the manners and etiquettes that were meant to be followed at this time, and seeing the interaction (or the lack thereof) between the different ranks of people.

The funniest character in this novel is Mr. Woodhouse. He is so petrified of everything that moves, and even things that don’t. He panics over the smallest instances, and you wonder if he is completely sane or capable of higher thinking. When he is talking about the wedding cake incidence and says “he could not but acknowledge that wedding cake might certainly disagree with many” (13), it shows this perfectly. He cannot eat wedding cake because he believes that it is too rich for his stomach. Because of his deep disregard for wedding cake, he expects everyone around him to dislike it as well. He encourages people not to eat it and even tries taking it away from people. This seems strange though, because usually women were stereotyped in this way. Austen characterizes Mr. Woodhouse though as the female character in this novel and Emma as the dominating man. Women in this time period did many things though that were not publicly seen and for the most part ran everything around the house. This is another amusing part of the story. The male character has all the traits of the stereotypical female, while Emma (the expected heroine), leads the house and runs everyone and everything.

Another thing that I enjoy about Emma is learning all about the history of who they could talk to, their dress, and just the manners that surround the people of high rank. It was interesting to me how they asked for marriage. Harriet and Mr. Martin seemed to not have had a ton of interaction and he just wrote her a letter one day asking for her hand in marriage. It seemed so distant, but in this time, that was acceptable. It was also interesting that because he was of a lower social class, first, Harriet should not marry him or else that would look bad on her part, but also because Emma could no longer be her friend. Emma doesn’t seem to have that many close acquaintances, so it was peculiar that she was willing to throw away one of her only friends because she married a man of lower class. But that was expected of her because Harriet would then be a lower class than her (even if they were close friends before the marriage).

Emma isn’t a terrible book. Does it keep me wanting to read more and encourage me to stay up late to figure out whose love life Emma destroys next…..no. But it is an interesting and actually quite a funny book that has many quality aspects that give it literary merit and interesting to read.

Is It True Love?

We have been reading Hamlet for a while now, and the same question keeps being asked; does Hamlet truly love Ophelia, or was he just using her for her body or to help him appear crazy. I believe that he truly did love Ophelia, and although many things have appeared in their relationship, he still cares for her and she still cares for him.

During the famous nunnery scene with Hamlet and Ophelia, Hamlet exclaims “I did love you once” (3.1.125). Although this is can be taken very literal, there is also an underlying sign that Hamlet shows. He was hurt when Ophelia told him about the remembrances. If the reader takes the play and thinks that Hamlet knows what’s going on, then he understands that Ophelia is plotting against him. He knows that she is blatantly lying in front of his face. This is why many people believe that Hamlet no longer loves Ophelia, but this just shows how deeply in love he was and still is. He was so disappointed and angry when he found out that his love was plotting against him; if he didn’t love her, he wouldn’t have been so angry and so upset.

Another way that someone brought up in class is that Hamlet tells Ophelia “Get thee to a/ nunnery” (3.1.148-149), he is trying to protect her. He understands that Polonius and Claudius are watching behind closed doors, and he might be trying to warn Ophelia of the dangers that are surrounding her. If she gets to a nunnery, she can be safe from the physical aspects of living in this palace. She wouldn’t have to deal with the labors such as her father and Claudius plotting. Hamlet might also be protecting her from men in general. He knows the dangers that men can put on woman, both he and her father are examples of this, and he wants to protect her from the hardships that surround her. Getting her to a nunnery would protect her, and this is an obvious showing of how much he cares for her.

Many people believe that Hamlet no longer loves Ophelia because of the way he treated her before the play that was being presented. He accused her of the same things that her father did earlier; being a prostitute, and selling her body to an assortment of men. But this can be interpreted as his hurt. When his true love stopped all connection to him and then appeared before him lying and deceiving, anyone would be affected. Although it is not polite or decent, few people handle this situation valiantly. Hamlet is an example of this, and once he has cooled down I suspect that apologies will be made on both sides and all reason will persevere.

Who's the Damsel?

Jackson Pearce came to talk to all the literature classes about the different examples of archetypes and how they fit into all of the basic storylines that we know. The archetype that caught my attention was that of the damsel in distress. Pearce made it very clear though that the damsel in distress did not have to be completely incapable or dependent on other characters; just at certain parts throughout the work of literature that they are in, they need help from those surrounding them. At some point, I believe that every character within every work is a damsel that needs the help of others to help them in their time of need.

In the Hunger Games, this was very evident. The stereotypical damsel in distress archetype would be placed on Prim in the beginning though. She is a frail, young girl that needs the help of others to survive even in the beginning of the book. When it is stated that she is supposed to go fight in the Hunger Games, Katniss has to step in and take her place. Prim is the ultimate character that needed saving, but she is not the only character within this novel that is the damsel in distress.

 Katniss can also be considered a damsel in distress as well. Although this would not be the first archetype that readers would place her under, she still has qualities of a damsel in distress. She needs the help of Peeta to survive and finish first in the Hunger Games, and after to support her in the rebellion following. Katniss has her moments of weakness, and although she puts on this act of being a tough individual that is self- reliant, she needs that “warrior” or “protective” figure to stand by her and fight for her in her time of need.

Peeta can also be considered a damsel at times. He was Katniss’ protector and guardian for much of the novel’s series, but in the last book, when his memory is taken away, the roles are reversed. He needs Katniss to remind him of the person that he used to be. He needs her to remain close and act like the figure that he was to her. Peeta is also the softer of the two boys fighting for Katniss, which also makes it easier to place him under this category.

There are always a few characters though that have little to no connection to the damsel in distress archetype. Gale is one of those characters. He is the “warrior” figure and although his attitude about fighting and running away and war have changed since the beginning of the book, his archetype has not. He still wants to fight for those people that he loves and he wants to fight for something bigger than himself. Characters like Gale are needed to oppose the damsel image.

 Archetypes are always found within characters, but some may not be as apparent as others. The juxtaposition between the warrior and damsel in distress must always counteract each other in order for there to be balance in the novel.

Amazing

A Thousand Splendid Suns was an amazing book that everyone should read at some time in their lives. I just finished it and I was shocked it took me so long to read, because I had a hard time putting it down. Although it wasn’t the most action packed book out on the shelves of Barnes and Noble, it was one of the most interesting books that I have ever read.

Warning, I am about to spoil a very important moment in the book! My favorite part of the entire book was how there was always a twist when I was least expecting it. Tariq was dead and Laila was mourning his lose and also how Aziza would never know her true father. I, along with Laila, trusted the “honest” man that came to tell the terrible news, and I have to admit, I was furious when I learned about his death. But then when the times seemed too rough for Laila to handle, Tariq showed back up. These twists always came during the bleakest moments and inspired new hope within the characters.

The connection that was made between the characters was so realistic as well. Khaled Hosseini really personified them well and made me feel that same emotions for different characters that they themselves were feeling. I felt the hatred that Miriam and Laila must have felt toward Rasheed every time that he beat them or spoke condescendingly to them. I felt the sadness that haunted Laila when she had to give Aziza to the orphanage and leave her behind every single day. I felt the tormented struggle to determine the emotions about Zalmai; was he a good child or was he going to turn into the same exact being as his father. All of these aspects of the story really kept me wanting to read more and more.

Another aspect that I liked was that it was realistic. Not everything ended happily ever after, making the connections and the plot seem even more real. Not everyone makes it into the peace time after the long fought wars, and this is shown through Mariam's sacrifice to Laila, Tariq, and the children. She made a decision (which she hadn’t done in decades) and saved all of them and gave them a better life.

The entire book just leaves me wanting to read more and learn how everything turns out; which is weird because I have never truly felt that way about a book that wasn’t drowning in action. I liked that the story didn’t need all of the bells and whistles, it just had the simple facts and the story and that is what I believe made it a truly fantastic book. Like I said everyone should have the opportunity to read this book at some point in their life to see a different aspect on a war that we have been fighting for years.

Two Time Periods, One Image

Reading through Hamlet; it reminds me of my outside reading book A Thousand Splendid Suns written by Khaled Hosseini. Upon reading Hamlets soliloquy in class, I kept seeing the reoccurring image of isolation and the feeling of not being accepted that I found in A Thousand Splendid Suns.

Hamlet feels isolated for many different reasons. His father has recently died and it hasn’t even been two months, before everyone has moved on. His mother is even remarrying to Hamlets uncle; her brother-in-law. This was considered incestuous at the time, but Hamlet is the only one that sees the marriage as such. Everyone else seems perfectly content with it. Hamlet also feels like he cannot properly mourn his father because everyone else has moved on. He idolized his father, and while the other citizens and country people have moved on under the reign of Claudius, Hamlet refuses this and continues to think of his father as the true and better king. Hamlet doesn’t even interact with many of the other characters found in the play. While speaking in court, he only addresses his mother and never directly speaks to Claudius.

Almost the same exact story line is occurring in A Thousand Splendid Suns. Miriam has lived with her mother in an isolated area because she is considered a “bastard” child that everyone wants to forget about. They are sent away to this deserted area so people can forget about them and the original sins of the father. This is very similar to Hamlet, because Hamlet was next in line for the throne, yet people seem to want to cast him aside. Miriam also goes through a terrible loss of her Nana (her mother’s name). While she continues to mourn, others are already making plans for her future. After just 2 weeks of mourning time in her biological father’s house, he finds a suitor for her and marries her off. When she cries in front of her new husband, Miriam is continually asked why? No one seems to understand the heavy lose that she has gone through. They all expected her to move on within the course of a few weeks, which is the same exact emotional response that Hamlet is receiving from the different members of his own family.

Miriam is also very isolated. She rarely talks to different characters and when others do approach her, she rarely comments directly back to them. She prefers to spend her times alone in the comfort of her own house.

It was interesting to see almost the same exact occurrences happening in two stories that couldn’t have been more different. Although they are set in different time periods in different parts of the world, this reoccurring imagery of being alone and not being understood is prevalent in many of the stories found in literature. I thought it was very interesting just how closely related these stories were though.

Ted Kooser

In class, we discussed Ted Kooser’s “Blind” poem, to better ourselves in analyzing poetry. I found that I really liked the way that he styled his poems. They were simple thoughts and words written in a pretty simple structure, but each different aspect had a key place. I enjoyed that each word’s denotation would lead to another words connotation or denotation. The web that it created was fascinating to look at and connect to other pieces of the puzzle.

I was planning on doing a more in depth read for my blog, but when I tried to find the poem “Blind”, I could only find the poem that he wrote called “A Blind Woman”. I decided that I was just going to look at it, and see if it was at least similar, and this is when I decided that Ted Kooser is my favorite poet.

She had turned her face up into
a rain of light, and came on smiling.

The light trickled down her forehead
and into her eyes. It ran down

into the neck of her sweatshirt
and wet the white tops of her breasts.

Her brown shoes splashed on
into the light. The moment was like

a circus wagon rolling before her
through puddles of light, a cage on wheels,

and she walked fast behind it,
exuberant, curious, pushing her cane

through the bars, poking and prodding,
while the world cowered back in a corner.

I liked the imagery of the light that is streaming in. When I think of light I think of the little rainbows that show up and the happiness that it usually brings along. But the specific colors that Kooser uses are white and brown. These colors are extremely muted, which was ironic for a piece about being light and colorful. The other imagery that came from the repetition of the word light was joyous happiness and even the curiosity that follows a young girl. But then there is that repeated imagery that is somewhat of a caged animal. The “cage of wheels” and how she is “pushing through the bars” makes it seem like she is caged and only sees light on a small occasion.

This led me to think, is she literally caged within a prison cell, or caged within her own body? She cannot see, which can be told from the title (Blind), but that could mean that her eyes cannot see at all, or that she is blind to the outside world that she is trying so hard to get to. The bars could be that she cannot overcome the struggles that await her.

It also makes me think that she is a sort of animal that people want to see, but at the same time, want to keep their distance from at the same time. The speaker talks about seeing the circus wagons, but then she goes on to say “through the bars, poking and prodding,
while the world cowered back in a corner”. She’s the act that people hope to keep their distance from. But then that also lead me back to the question of what are they wanting to see from her. She might be blind to this as well. She might not see what they see.

This used to frustrate me about poetry that I could never have a clear answer to a question that I had. The poet wasn’t right there to explain the exact uses for the words that he had chosen. But this actually interests me. I like to think of all the different questions and actually using the text to support and disclaim the different theories that float through my head. Poetry is interesting once you find a poet that writes in a style that you prefer.

Not That Bad

When Ms. Clinch first told us that we were about to start a poetry unit, I secretly panicked inside. I have never been able to completely analyze poems the way that the teacher and even the other students have, and knowing that complete analysis is needed for this class, the poetry unit seemed like a difficult unit to cover.

But I’ve learned over the past week that I can find almost anything in a poem and write a semi-solid response on it.  There are so many ways that the poet both visually captures the poems central theme by using various word structures but also the specific words that can be the ultimate piece of understanding the poem and it’s so what.

My favorite poet that we have read in class so far is e.e cummings. I like that he goes against everything that English professors pick over. Nothing is capitalized and words seem to be randomly thrown around, while the stanza’s structure is so diluted that there seems to be no meaning. But every single piece of the poem has a meaning. In the poem in Just, only two words are capitalized, and even after an entire class period discussing it, a proper answer wasn’t formed.

I used to not like that poetry had no answer. That even after a lot of thought and discussion, the true meaning that the poet was trying to convey is never properly struck down. But after last semester of intense analysis, I enjoy that I can take a different meaning from the poem and not be entirely correct. And seeing all the small things that the class picks up is very interesting and adds to my own thoughts about the poem as a whole.

When Ms. Clinch stated that we would have a timed writing on analyzing a poem, my heart did sort of drop though. I did not believe that I was ready to jump into the deep end of completely analyzing a poem for myself. How would I be able to come up with my own ideas and write a solid essay without the help of Ms. Clinch or my fellow peers?

When I walked into class Friday, I was dreading writing this timed writing. I looked at the poem and had a literal pity party for myself for at least a minute, but then I looked at it, read the prompt and started analyzing the prompt. I soon started to see how the structure of the stanzas was leading me to believe one thing about the poem, and that led me to see another aspect of the poem that I had missed in the beginning. Before I knew it, my poem was marked up and I had questions scattered around the margins that would help me write this timed writing. It wasn’t as difficult as it seemed and I realized that poetry isn’t as terrible as it first seemed merely a week ago.